In times of climate change, hospitals also need to develop sustainable strategies for the protection of resources. Anesthesiology and intensive care medicine are among the most resource- and energy-intensive areas: they generate a significant proportion of hospital and medication waste, which must be disposed of properly. “Propofol is a leader in terms of medication waste,” explains Prof. Dr. Mark Coburn, Director of the Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine (KAI) at the UKB, who also conducts research at the University of Bonn. The anesthetic is used to induce and maintain anesthesia. It is routinely injected in the operating room first with a syringe to induce anesthesia and, after the patient has fallen asleep, a continuous infusion often follows via a separate automatic syringe pump. The problem: “In some institutions, up to 45 percent of all medication waste in the operating room is propofol,” emphasizes Dr. Florian Windler, a KAI assistant physician at the UKB. In addition, a quarter of the anesthetic prepared remains unused or underused at the end of the operation and goes to waste.
Is a single syringe pump more ecological?
A research team in Bonn has now investigated whether the use of a single syringe pump for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia instead of a separate syringe for induction reduces propofol waste. Anesthetists already use this method. There are no known disadvantages for patient safety as a result of this procedure. However, the researchers analyzed whether it is really more environmentally friendly by examining propofol consumption and waste in the anesthesia protocols of over 300 surgeries performed between June 2021 and June 2023. They compared the procedures using the conventional method with those using the alternative with only one syringe pump. They also examined whether the propofol discard between the two methods varied in relation to clinical data such as the age, weight and gender of the patients, as well as their alcohol and drug consumption.
The results showed that “on average, around 30 percent less propofol was discarded per operation when anesthesia was administered using a single syringe pump,” says first and corresponding author Dr. Windler. For procedures lasting between 20 and 100 minutes, this procedure without a separate syringe for the anesthesia even resulted in up to almost 50 percent less propofol waste. Patient's age, gender, weight or pre-existing conditions had no influence on the waste in the operating room. The situation was different for patients who consumed alcohol or other substances on a regular basis. These patients usually require more anesthetic during surgery. The waste in these patients was increased. “Interestingly, this only occurred when we administered an additional syringe. The effect is not visible when using the syringe pump, but rather reduces waste by up to 49 percent,” adds co-author Prof. Coburn.
A "greener" approach to anesthesia in the future
“Our analysis indicates that the use of a single syringe pump for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia is the best option overall,” Dr. Windler concludes from the results. The method could therefore actually represent a more sustainable method. In addition, this also has an economic effect: if the procedure is used 10 to 15 times a day, around 1,300 of the frequently used 20-milliliter vials of propofol can be saved per year. “From an ecological as well as an economic point of view, the induction of anesthesia with a separate syringe should be reconsidered as the standard method,” appeals Prof. Coburn. He initiated the Green Team at KAI at the UKB: “We want to put more emphasis on sustainability in the clinical focus,” he explains. “The study on propofol waste shows how we can reduce the environmental impact of our work without compromising the quality of patient care.”